by U.S. G.P.O., For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office in Washington .
Written in English
|Series||S. hrg. ;, 105-198|
|Contributions||United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations.|
|LC Classifications||KF26 .G67 1997m|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||iii, 65 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||65|
|LC Control Number||98132585|
An Act. To provide for the establishment of strategic planning and performance measurement in the Federal Government, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the "Government Performance and Results Act of ". NCBI Bookshelf. A service of the National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. National Academy of Sciences (US), National Academy of Engineering (US), and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. Implementing the Government Performance and Results Act for Research: A Status Report. Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed federal agencies' implementation of the Government Performance and Results Act of (GPRA), including the prospects for compliance by federal agencies beyond those participating as pilots under the act, focusing on: (1) the status of the act's implementation efforts; (2) significant challenges confronting executive agencies in their. The Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of requires federal agencies to prepare a strategic plan covering a multiyear period and requires each agency to submit an annual performance plan and an annual performance report. Although the Board is not covered by GPRA, the Board follows the spirit of the act and, like other federal agencies, prepares an annual performance plan and an annual performance report.
Implementation of the Government Performance and Results Act of Contents MEMORANDUM: OMB Implementation of the Government Performance and Results Act of I. SUMMER REVIEW OF STRATEGIC PLANS. A. Strategic Plans in General; B. Strategic Plan Material to be Provided OMB; C. Agencies Lacking Requested Material; D. Problems or Issues. The Government Performance and Results Act of (GPRA) seeks to shift the focus of government performance and accountability away from simply the activities being performed to the results and outcomes of those activities. The purpose of GPRA is to systematically hold federal agencies accountable for achieving program results. Enacted in , GPRA was designed to improve program management throughout the Federal government. Agencies are required to develop a five-year strategic plan outlining its mission, long-term goals for the agency's major functions, performance measures, and reporting results. The strategic plan is updated every 3 years; DOL's current strategic plan can be found on the Strategic Plan . In September, , the government-wide provisions of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) take effect. As part of our ongoing effort to help departments and agencies improve program management, resource allocation, and accountability, several major initiatives will .
the capability of the Federal Government, by systematically holding Federal agencies accountable for achieving program results; • (2) initiate program performance reform with a series of pilot projects in setting program goals, measuring program performance against those goals, and . set forth any recommended changes in the other requirements of the Government Performance and Results Act of , section of title 5, sections , . Get this from a library! Implementation of the Government Performance and Results Act of joint hearing before the Committees on Governmental Affairs and Appropriations, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, first session, J [United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Governmental Affairs.; United States. DISCUSSION FORUM The Government Performance and Results Act Peter Hernon* One Discussion Forum essay, in , offered the Editorial Board's views about a research agenda relating to government information policies, services, and practices,' and a sympo- sium issue, published that same year, examined information resources management under the rubric of the Information Technology Cited by: